Fertilization is not a new beginning: the relationship between sperm longevity and offspring performance

Authors: Angela J Crean, John M Dwyer and Dustin J Marshall

Published in: PLoS ONE, volume 7, issue 11, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049167

Abstract

Styela plicata larvae
Styela plicata larvae. Image courtesy of Bronwyn Galletly.

Sperm are the most diverse cell type known: varying not only among- and within- species, but also among- and within- ejaculates of a single male.

Recently, the causes and consequences of variability in sperm phenotypes have received much attention, but the importance of within-ejaculate variability remains largely unknown.

Correlative evidence suggests that reduced within-ejaculate variation in sperm phenotype increases a male’s fertilization success in competitive conditions; but the transgenerational consequences of within-ejaculate variation in sperm phenotype remain relatively unexplored.

Here we examine the relationship between sperm longevity and offspring performance in a marine invertebrate with external fertilization, Styela plicata. Offspring sired by longer-lived sperm had higher performance compared to offspring sired by freshly-extracted sperm of the same ejaculate, both in the laboratory and the field. This indicates that within-ejaculate differences in sperm longevity can influence offspring fitness – a source of variability in offspring phenotypes that has not previously been considered. Links between sperm phenotype and offspring performance may constrain responses to selection on either sperm or offspring traits, with broad ecological and evolutionary implications.

Full paper

Crean AJ, Dwyer JM, Marshall DJ (2012) Fertilization is not a new beginning: the relationship between sperm longevity and offspring performance. PLoS ONE 7 (11) PDFPDF 254 KB External linkFull text, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049167

Revisiting the classic biogeographical patterns in marine invertebrate reproduction

After four years of data collection and over 4,000 papers, our paper revisiting the classic biogeographical patterns in marine invertebrate reproduction has been published here.

 Published paper: The biogeography of marine invertebrate life histories

Heat map of the distribution of studies used in the review to examine geographical variation in marine invertebrate life histories. The vast majority of the marine environment remains unstudied, and our view of marine life histories comes from only a small fraction of those studies that exist.

The biogeography of marine invertebrate life histories

Authors: Dustin J Marshall, Patrick J Krug, Elena K Kupriyanova, Maria Byrne and Richard B Emlet

Published in: Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, volume 43, pp. 97–114, doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145004

Abstract

Biologists have long sought to identify and explain patterns in the diverse array of marine life histories. The most famous speculation about such patterns is Gunnar Thorson’s suggestion that species producing planktonic larvae are rarer at higher latitudes (Thorson’s rule). Although some elements of Thorson’s rule have proven incorrect, other elements remain untested.

With a wealth of new life-history data, statistical approaches, and remote-sensing technology, new insights into marine reproduction can be generated.

We gathered life-history data for more than 1,000 marine invertebrates and examined patterns in the prevalence of different life histories. Systematic patterns in marine life histories exist at a range of scales, some of which support Thorson, whereas others suggest previously unrecognized relationships between the marine environment and the life histories of marine invertebrates.

Overall, marine life histories covary strongly with temperature and local ocean productivity, and different regions should be managed accordingly.

Full paper

Marshall DJ, Krug PJ, Kupriyanova EK, Byrne M, Emlet RB (2012) The biogeography of marine invertebrate life-histories. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 43: 97–114 External linke-print doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145004